Soil series profile
Marvyn soil series
Marvyn is a well drained soil with a loamy sand surface, mapped on 133,928 acres in 13 counties across 3 states. Hydrologic group B.
- Drainage class
- Well drained 100% of mapped acres
- Hydrologic group
- B 100% of mapped acres
- Typical topsoil pH
- 5.3 strongly acidic · range 5.3–5.3
- Mapped area
- 134k acres in 13 counties, 3 states
Typical Marvyn profile
Texture and pH by depth
Show as a table
| Depth | Texture | pH | Clay | Sand | Organic matter |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0–7 in (H1) | Loamy sand | 5.3 | 5% | 80% | 1.25% |
| 7–30 in (H2) | Sandy clay loam | 5.0 | 27% | 56% | 0.5% |
| 30–61 in (H3) | Sandy clay | 5.0 | 35% | 52% | 0.3% |
| 61–72 in (H4) | Sandy loam | 5.0 | 15% | 70% | 0.15% |

What this means
What Marvyn soil means for gardens, lawns and septic systems
For gardens
Typical topsoil in Marvyn soils is strongly acidic: pH 5.3. Most vegetables and lawn grasses do best around 6.0 to 7.0, so lime is often needed; blueberries, azaleas and rhododendrons like it as it is.
Sandy topsoil covers 68% of mapped Marvyn acres. It drains fast and warms early in spring, but dries out and loses nutrients quickly: mulch, compost and steady watering help. The most common surface texture is loamy fine sand (43% of mapped Marvyn acres).
100% of mapped Marvyn acres is moderately well to excessively drained, which suits most garden plants.
For lawns and yards
Most land is in hydrologic groups B and C, where rain soaks in at a moderate pace.
For a septic system
For conventional septic absorption fields, NRCS rates <1% of the acres in mapped Marvyn soils very limited, >99% somewhat limited and 0% not limited.
Only a licensed site evaluation or perc test at the actual lot decides whether a system is allowed and which design.
Where Marvyn soil is found
Mapped acres
Marvyn is mapped in Alabama, North Carolina and South Carolina.
| County | Acres | Share of county land |
|---|---|---|
| Lee County, AL | 27,346 | 8.0% |
| Macon County, AL | 19,997 | 5.8% |
| Sampson County, NC | 19,711 | 3.5% |
| Duplin County, NC | 19,573 | 4.2% |
| Onslow County, NC | 16,114 | 3.6% |
| Elmore County, AL | 12,596 | 3.5% |
| Tallapoosa County, AL | 4,095 | 1.0% |
| Pender County, NC | 3,702 | 0.7% |
| Russell County, AL | 3,698 | 1.0% |
| Brunswick County, NC | 2,129 | 0.4% |
| Chilton County, AL | 2,043 | 0.5% |
| Jones County, NC | 1,996 | 0.7% |
| Lee County, SC | 927 | 0.4% |
Septic absorption fields
NRCS rating, share of Marvyn acres
Show as a table
| Category | Share of acres |
|---|---|
| Not limited | 0.0% |
| Somewhat limited | 99.3% |
| Very limited | 0.7% |
Drainage, water table and flooding
Share of Marvyn acres
- Depth to seasonal high water table
- None reported within about 6.5 feet (median where reported).
- Flooding
- Not mapped as flooding on most acres.
- Slope
- Typically 3–11% (median 6%).
- Topsoil organic matter
- Median 1.2%.
Drainage class
Show as a table
| Category | Share of acres |
|---|---|
| Excessively drained | 0.0% |
| Somewhat excessively drained | 0.0% |
| Well drained | 100.0% |
| Moderately well drained | 0.0% |
| Somewhat poorly drained | 0.0% |
| Poorly drained | 0.0% |
| Very poorly drained | 0.0% |
Hydrologic soil group
Show as a table
| Category | Share of acres |
|---|---|
| A: fast infiltration (mostly sandy or gravelly) | 0.0% |
| B: moderate infiltration | 100.0% |
| C: slow infiltration | 0.0% |
| D: very slow infiltration (clayey, shallow or wet) | 0.0% |
| A/D: D as is, A if drained | 0.0% |
| B/D: D as is, B if drained | 0.0% |
| C/D: D as is, C if drained | 0.0% |
Sources & data dates
- Source
- USDA NRCS Soil Survey Geographic Database (SSURGO), queried through Soil Data Access. Public domain.
- Data date
- SSURGO as published on November 3, 2026 (most recent survey area update October 26, 2026). NRCS refreshes SSURGO each October.
- Scope
- All map unit components named Marvyn (component kind "Series") in SSURGO: 133,928 acres.
- Method
- Shares are by mapped acres of Marvyn components. The profile comes from the single largest Marvyn component. Full methodology.