County soil summary

Soil types in Richmond County, Georgia

The most widespread soils are Troup, Lakeland and Orangeburg; the most common drainage class is well drained (38% of the land), and typical topsoil pH is 5.3.

Mapped soil survey data 204,000 acres of mapped land · 26 named soil series

Well or moderately well drained
76%
of land · state 69%
Typical topsoil pH
5.3
strongly acidic · state 5.3
Septic fields very limited
44%
of land · state 68%
Subject to flooding
19%
of land, any frequency · state 19%

Most common soils in Richmond County

Share of mapped land

A county is a patchwork of many soils. These 8 cover 70% of the mapped land; 26 named soil series are mapped here in all.

Most common soils in Richmond County by share of mapped land
Soil Share of land Drainage Topsoil pH
Troup 26.6% Somewhat excessively drained 5.3
Lakeland 7.9% Excessively drained 5.3
Orangeburg 6.8% Well drained 5.3
Ailey 6.5% Well drained 5.5
Urban landLand type, not a soil series 6.2% — —
Vaucluse 6.1% Well drained 5.3
Bibb 5.2% Poorly drained 4.6
Lucy 5.1% Well drained 5.3

Drainage and pH for a series are its typical values across all its mapped acres nationwide. A dash means the row is not a soil series.

What this means

What the soils in Richmond County mean for gardens, lawns and septic systems

For your garden

Typical topsoil in Richmond County is strongly acidic: pH 5.3 (most land between 4.6 and 5.5). Most vegetables and lawn grasses do best around 6.0 to 7.0, so lime is often needed; blueberries, azaleas and rhododendrons like it as it is.

Sandy topsoil covers 67% of the land. It drains fast and warms early in spring, but dries out and loses nutrients quickly: mulch, compost and steady watering help. The most common surface texture is loamy sand (30% of the land).

35% of the land is excessively or somewhat excessively drained: water moves through fast, so gardens need more frequent watering in dry spells.

For your lawn and yard

35% of the land is in hydrologic group A, where water soaks in fast. Lawns there dry out quickly; deeper, less frequent watering and organic matter help.

For a septic system

For conventional septic absorption fields, NRCS rates 44% of the land in Richmond County very limited, 48% somewhat limited and 0% not limited (8% not rated, such as urban land, pits or water).

Statewide, 68% of the land is very limited, so Richmond County is less restrictive than typical.

Flooding is mapped on 19% of the land (<1% occasional, 18% frequent).

Only a licensed site evaluation or perc test at the actual lot decides whether a system is allowed and which design.

Generated from the mapped numbers above using fixed rules, not a site visit. See how these notes are written.

Drainage

How long the soil stays wet

The most common drainage class is well drained (38%). 76% of the land is moderately well drained or better, compared with 69% across Georgia.

Excessively drained 8%
Somewhat excessively drained 27%
Well drained 38%
Moderately well drained 4%
Somewhat poorly drained 3%
Poorly drained 12%
Very poorly drained <1%
Not rated 8%
Natural drainage class, share of mapped land in Richmond County. Scale 0 to 100% of mapped land.
Show as a table
Natural drainage class, share of mapped land in Richmond County.
CategoryRichmond CountyGeorgia
Excessively drained7.9%2.1%
Somewhat excessively drained26.6%3.0%
Well drained37.7%58.8%
Moderately well drained4.1%4.7%
Somewhat poorly drained3.4%7.4%
Poorly drained11.9%16.5%
Very poorly drained0.6%5.9%
Not rated7.9%1.5%

Septic absorption fields

NRCS rating for conventional drain fields

The rating looks at the soil from 24 to 60 inches deep: permeability, depth to a seasonal water table or bedrock, flooding and slope. “Very limited” means at least one feature is unfavorable enough that a conventional field is hard to make work.

Not limited 0%
Somewhat limited 48%
Very limited 44%
Not rated 8%
Septic tank absorption field rating, share of mapped land in Richmond County. Scale 0 to 100% of mapped land.
Show as a table
Septic tank absorption field rating, share of mapped land in Richmond County.
CategoryRichmond CountyGeorgia
Not limited0.0%0.3%
Somewhat limited48.1%30.3%
Very limited44.0%68.0%
Not rated7.9%1.5%

Rain, runoff and water table

Hydrologic soil group, flooding, seasonal water table

Hydrologic soil group

How fast rain soaks in when the soil is already wet. Group A soaks in fastest, D slowest.

A: fast infiltration (mostly sandy or gravelly) 35%
B: moderate infiltration 25%
C: slow infiltration 17%
D: very slow infiltration (clayey, shallow or wet) 0%
A/D: D as is, A if drained 2%
B/D: D as is, B if drained 10%
C/D: D as is, C if drained 4%
Not rated 8%
Hydrologic soil group, share of mapped land in Richmond County. Scale 0 to 100% of mapped land.
Show as a table
Hydrologic soil group, share of mapped land in Richmond County.
CategoryRichmond CountyGeorgia
A: fast infiltration (mostly sandy or gravelly)34.6%10.5%
B: moderate infiltration25.1%44.5%
C: slow infiltration16.6%10.9%
D: very slow infiltration (clayey, shallow or wet)0.0%6.8%
A/D: D as is, A if drained2.2%7.4%
B/D: D as is, B if drained9.7%12.4%
C/D: D as is, C if drained3.9%5.9%
Not rated7.9%1.5%

Flooding

No flooding 81%
Rare or very rare 0%
Occasional <1%
Frequent or very frequent 18%
Not reported <1%
Most frequent flooding class in any month, share of mapped land in Richmond County. Scale 0 to 100% of mapped land.
Show as a table
Most frequent flooding class in any month, share of mapped land in Richmond County.
CategoryRichmond CountyGeorgia
No flooding80.6%80.5%
Rare or very rare0.0%1.2%
Occasional0.8%4.7%
Frequent or very frequent18.2%12.7%
Not reported0.4%0.9%

Seasonal high water table

Within 18 inches at some time of year 16%
18 inches to 3.3 feet 4%
Deeper than 3.3 feet or none reported 80%
Not reported 0%
Shallowest depth to a saturated zone in any month, share of mapped land in Richmond County. Scale 0 to 100% of mapped land.
Show as a table
Shallowest depth to a saturated zone in any month, share of mapped land in Richmond County.
CategoryRichmond CountyGeorgia
Within 18 inches at some time of year15.8%25.4%
18 inches to 3.3 feet4.1%8.6%
Deeper than 3.3 feet or none reported80.1%65.6%
Not reported0.0%0.4%

Topsoil pH and texture

First mineral layer of each soil

Typical topsoil pH is 5.3 (strongly acidic); 80% of rated land falls between 4.6 and 5.5. Median topsoil organic matter is 0.8%.

Strongly acidic (below 5.5) 73%
Moderately to slightly acidic (5.5–6.4) 19%
Near neutral (6.5–7.3) 0%
Alkaline (7.4 and up) 0%
Not reported 8%
Topsoil pH band, share of mapped land in Richmond County. Scale 0 to 100% of mapped land.
Show as a table
Topsoil pH band, share of mapped land in Richmond County.
CategoryRichmond CountyGeorgia
Strongly acidic (below 5.5)72.9%56.5%
Moderately to slightly acidic (5.5–6.4)19.2%40.7%
Near neutral (6.5–7.3)0.0%1.2%
Alkaline (7.4 and up)0.0%0.0%
Not reported7.9%1.6%

Texture

Sandy 67%
Loamy (loam, silt loam and similar) 25%
Clayey (40%+ clay) 0%
Organic (muck or peat) 0%
Not reported (rock, urban land, etc.) 8%
Topsoil texture group, share of mapped land in Richmond County. Scale 0 to 100% of mapped land.
Show as a table
Topsoil texture group, share of mapped land in Richmond County.
CategoryRichmond CountyGeorgia
Sandy66.8%42.8%
Loamy (loam, silt loam and similar)25.4%53.7%
Clayey (40%+ clay)0.0%1.0%
Organic (muck or peat)0.0%1.0%
Not reported (rock, urban land, etc.)7.9%1.5%

Most common surface textures: loamy sand 30% · fine sand 27% · fine sandy loam 10% · sand 8% · loam 5%.

Sources & data dates

Source
USDA NRCS Soil Survey Geographic Database (SSURGO), queried through Soil Data Access. Public domain.
Data date
SSURGO as published on November 3, 2026 (most recent survey area update October 26, 2026). NRCS refreshes SSURGO each October.
Scope
Richmond County, Georgia (FIPS 13245): 204,130 acres of mapped land, 5,305 acres of open water excluded. State comparisons pool all mapped land in Georgia.
Method
Shares are by mapped land area: each map unit’s acres in the county times each soil component’s percentage. Open water is excluded. Topsoil values use the first mineral horizon of each component. Full methodology.

Independent reference site. No government affiliation or endorsement.