Soil series profile
Riedtown soil series
Riedtown is a moderately well drained soil with a silt loam surface, mapped on 92,563 acres in 3 counties in MS. Hydrologic group B/D.
- Drainage class
- Moderately well drained 100% of mapped acres
- Hydrologic group
- B/D 69% of mapped acres
- Typical topsoil pH
- 6.2 slightly acidic · range 6.2–6.5
- Mapped area
- 93k acres in 3 counties, 1 state
Typical Riedtown profile
Texture and pH by depth
Show as a table
| Depth | Texture | pH | Clay | Sand | Organic matter |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0–7 in (Ap) | Silt loam | 6.2 | 13% | 3% | 2% |
| 7–27 in (Bw) | Silt loam | 5.8 | 15% | 2% | 0.25% |
| 27–42 in (Bb/E) | Silt loam | 6.2 | 20% | 4% | 0.2% |
| 42–80 in (Bgb) | Silt loam | 6.4 | 21% | 4% | 0.25% |

What this means
What Riedtown soil means for gardens, lawns and septic systems
For gardens
Typical topsoil in Riedtown soils is slightly acidic: pH 6.2 (most land between 6.2 and 6.5), the range most vegetables, flowers and lawn grasses prefer.
Loamy topsoil (loam, silt loam and similar) covers 100% of mapped Riedtown acres: generally the easiest soil to garden, holding moisture without staying waterlogged. The most common surface texture is silt loam (100% of mapped Riedtown acres).
100% of mapped Riedtown acres is moderately well to excessively drained, which suits most garden plants.
For lawns and yards
On 100% of mapped acres, rain soaks in slowly (hydrologic groups C and D, including dual groups that are D until drained). Expect runoff and puddles after heavy rain: core-aerate compacted lawns and keep ground sloping away from foundations.
For a septic system
For conventional septic absorption fields, NRCS rates 100% of the acres in mapped Riedtown soils very limited, 0% somewhat limited and 0% not limited.
Where the soil is very limited (slow permeability, a high water table, flooding, shallow bedrock or steep slopes), alternative systems such as mound or sand-filter designs are common and cost more.
Flooding is mapped on 100% of the acres (76% occasional, 0% frequent).
Only a licensed site evaluation or perc test at the actual lot decides whether a system is allowed and which design.
Where Riedtown soil is found
Mapped acres
Riedtown is mapped in Mississippi.
| County | Acres | Share of county land |
|---|---|---|
| Hinds County, MS | 63,319 | 11.5% |
| Wilkinson County, MS | 22,396 | 5.2% |
| Madison County, MS | 6,848 | 1.5% |
Septic absorption fields
NRCS rating, share of Riedtown acres
Show as a table
| Category | Share of acres |
|---|---|
| Not limited | 0.0% |
| Somewhat limited | 0.0% |
| Very limited | 100.0% |
Drainage, water table and flooding
Share of Riedtown acres
- Depth to seasonal high water table
- About 1.8 feet (22 in) (median where reported).
- Flooding
- Mapped as flooding on 100% of acres (76% occasional, 0% frequent).
- Slope
- Typically 1–1% (median 1%).
- Topsoil organic matter
- Median 2%.
Drainage class
Show as a table
| Category | Share of acres |
|---|---|
| Excessively drained | 0.0% |
| Somewhat excessively drained | 0.0% |
| Well drained | 0.0% |
| Moderately well drained | 100.0% |
| Somewhat poorly drained | 0.0% |
| Poorly drained | 0.0% |
| Very poorly drained | 0.0% |
Hydrologic soil group
Show as a table
| Category | Share of acres |
|---|---|
| A: fast infiltration (mostly sandy or gravelly) | 0.0% |
| B: moderate infiltration | 0.0% |
| C: slow infiltration | 31.1% |
| D: very slow infiltration (clayey, shallow or wet) | 0.0% |
| A/D: D as is, A if drained | 0.0% |
| B/D: D as is, B if drained | 68.9% |
| C/D: D as is, C if drained | 0.0% |
Sources & data dates
- Source
- USDA NRCS Soil Survey Geographic Database (SSURGO), queried through Soil Data Access. Public domain.
- Data date
- SSURGO as published on November 3, 2026 (most recent survey area update October 26, 2026). NRCS refreshes SSURGO each October.
- Scope
- All map unit components named Riedtown (component kind "Series") in SSURGO: 92,563 acres.
- Method
- Shares are by mapped acres of Riedtown components. The profile comes from the single largest Riedtown component. Full methodology.